keplar

W-L-T Winrate Round W-L-T Round Winrate
599-596-107 50.12% 2716-2711-445 50.04%

Overview

Classes

Class W-L-T Winrate DA/M Acc DA/S Time Played
Scout 164-215-30 43.77% 242 54% 14 144:06:50
Soldier 404-341-73 53.85% 262 39% 23 300:54:59
Pyro 211 22% 2 26:29
Demo 279 14% 8 3:29
Engineer 2-3-0 40.00% 219 23% 8 3:31:24
Heavy 259 26% 8 1:49:35
Medic 7-4-0 63.64% 42 40% 9 4:31:56
Sniper 1-1-0 50.00% 222 29% 25 1:50:09
Spy 288 41% 88 36:14

Formats

Format W-L-T Winrate Time Played
Ultiduo 5-4-0 55.56% 2:31:32
Fours 1-0-0 100.00% 12:09
Sixes 558-546-105 50.50% 447:34:46
Prolander 4-2-0 66.67% 2:04:35
Highlander 11-14-0 44.00% 7:23:15
Other 3-4-0 42.86% 1:24:12

Aliases

Name Count
Keplar <3 434
keplar 302
kplr 238
k 48
kep1ar 43
kp1r 27
QUACK keplar 27
kep lar 25
Quack keplar 25
kPlr 25

Recent Teams

League Team Competitions Division Format Rostered From Rostered To
RGL ducks can drive 6s Retro Cup #1 to 6s Season 20 Amateur Sixes
RGL Malding Mallards 6s Exp Cup #6 to 6s Miniseason Spring 2026 AM - BLU Sixes
RGL Huberts 6s Season 19 Amateur Sixes
RGL jump map team Sixes S12 Intermediate Sixes
RGL Forced Windows Update Sixes S9 to Sixes S11 Amateur Sixes
RGL Aero 1987 Sixes S8 Amateur Sixes
RGL Streets Of Gold HL Season 11 Amateur Highlander

Recent Logs

Title Map Classes W-L-T Format Duration K D A D/M DT/M HG/M HR/M Acc Date
na.serveme.tf #622356 QUACK vs wRED cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 0-4-1 sixes 18:13 12 15 3 266 258 42%
na.serveme.tf #622356 QUACK vs TSS cp_granary_pro_rc17a3 Soldier 3-5-0 sixes 27:08 13 19 4 219 203 37%
na.serveme.tf #622241 QUACK vs mbdtm cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 0-5-0 sixes 12:15 5 10 1 300 221 41%
na.serveme.tf #622241 QUACK vs RED cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 0-4-0 sixes 19:02 19 15 3 283 210 44%
na.serveme.tf #622241 QUACK vs RED cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 1-5-0 sixes 27:30 19 24 6 272 274 41%
na.serveme.tf #621787 QUACK vs SPAMS koth_product_final Soldier 4-2-0 sixes 37:25 21 30 7 217 246 30%
na.serveme.tf #621478: 1kg vs QUACK cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 4-1-2 sixes 28:59 12 23 6 191 248 32%
na.serveme.tf #621478: 1kg vs QUACK koth_product_final Soldier 3-0-0 sixes 18:15 12 17 3 229 214 33%
na.serveme.tf #621477: BLU vs QUACK cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 2-2-2 sixes 29:09 13 24 4 201 252 36%
na.serveme.tf #621477: BLU vs QUACK koth_product_final Soldier 1-3-0 sixes 22:16 15 17 5 285 259 34%
na.serveme.tf #621477: TNF vs QUACK cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier 1-5-0 sixes 19:02 9 18 5 268 246 34%
na.serveme.tf #621477: QUACK vs TNF koth_product_final Soldier 3-0-0 sixes 20:50 21 18 4 349 293 40%
na.serveme.tf #621652 QUACK vs RED cp_gullywash_f9 Soldier Spy 2-2-3 sixes 28:28 23 26 2 281 265 44%
na.serveme.tf #621652 QUACK vs 30CHAR koth_product_final Soldier 3-0-0 sixes 16:38 14 17 3 305 248 44%
na.serveme.tf #621475: Poblem vs QUACK cp_metalworks_f7 Soldier 2-1-0 sixes 10:08 11 5 3 252 163 38%
na.serveme.tf #621475: BLU vs QUACK koth_product_final Soldier 3-2-0 sixes 28:06 27 31 9 349 269 43%
na.serveme.tf #620883: Garf vs QUACK cp_process_f12 Soldier 4-1-0 sixes 30:29 15 24 7 210 211 37%
na.serveme.tf #621094: QUACK vs METAA cp_process_f12 Soldier 4-2-1 sixes 19:47 14 16 5 239 260 43%
na.serveme.tf #621094: QUACK vs METAA cp_process_f12 Soldier 3-2-0 sixes 29:08 21 24 3 235 224 37%
na.serveme.tf #620999: spams vs QUACK cp_process_f12 Soldier 4-0-1 sixes 17:05 11 16 1 215 225 44%
na.serveme.tf #620999: spams vs QUACK cp_process_f12 Soldier 4-2-0 sixes 29:01 22 21 5 305 221 47%
na.serveme.tf #620999: BLU vs QUACK cp_process_f12 Soldier 3-0-0 sixes 19:59 7 17 5 222 227 40%
na.serveme.tf #620999: BLU vs QUACK cp_process_f12 Soldier 4-2-1 sixes 28:59 17 22 4 267 191 44%
na.serveme.tf #620456: QUACK vs ICB cp_snakewater_final1 Soldier 2-1-2 sixes 29:41 10 22 8 172 180 34%
na.serveme.tf #620455 QUACK vs 1kg cp_snakewater_final1 Soldier 2-0-2 sixes 12:28 8 9 0 213 200 44%